Minister Calls for Change in Housing Objections Over Area ‘Character’
Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers has called for a shift in attitudes towards housing development objections based on the “character” of an area, arguing that such objections hinder the broader social and economic goals of increasing housing supply. Chambers made these remarks while launching a new taskforce aimed at identifying and addressing obstacles in infrastructure delivery.
Chambers expressed concern that objections rooted in aesthetic considerations are too often tolerated, which can impede the development of much-needed housing. He noted that many young people have reported instances where long-time residents have blocked housing projects by citing the character of their neighbourhoods. Chambers described these objections as “nebulous” and a barrier to progress.
The minister’s comments came after the government approved a series of measures to expedite the delivery of strategic infrastructure. These measures include a review of the National Development Plan, the formation of a new infrastructure division to collaborate with key delivery agencies, and the establishment of a taskforce dedicated to accelerating infrastructure projects.
Chambers emphasised that the new division’s main focus will be on reform, criticising the tendency to object to housing developments. He announced plans for an evidence-based assessment to identify the barriers to timely infrastructure development, which will guide the implementation of high-impact reform measures.
When asked about the potential for changing planning regulations to prevent objections from delaying projects, Chambers stated that all options should be considered to achieve faster infrastructure delivery. He highlighted numerous instances where individuals have obstructed housing projects, undermining the public good.
Chambers questioned the validity of objections based on an area’s character, arguing that new housing and residents enhance diversity and character. He expressed frustration with the mindset that existing residents have a veto over new developments, which he believes must change.
The minister cited examples of sensible housing proposals in Dublin that were rejected on aesthetic grounds, stressing that additional housing should not be seen as detrimental to an area’s character. He argued that areas with significant character should not be exempt from accommodating new housing or community infrastructure.
Addressing concerns about potential deregulation, Chambers clarified that the goal is to balance regulation with the broader public interest. He advocated for a balanced approach that maintains necessary standards while facilitating infrastructure and housing delivery.
Chambers concluded by emphasising the importance of protecting standards that benefit residents while ensuring that regulations do not unnecessarily constrain economic and social progress. He called for a balanced approach to regulation that supports the state’s long-term interests.
