Planning Permission Ireland
RefusedRetentionDecided 1 November 2016

98 Deerpark, Friars Walk

Retention of a widened driveway and vehicular access following boundary wall removal.

1637063 · Cork City Council · Lodged 9 September 2016

Reference
1637063
Authority
Cork City Council
Register status
Decided
Type
RETENTION
Received
9 September 2016

Summary

AI-generated

The applicant is seeking retention permission for the removal of a boundary wall. This work was carried out to widen the vehicular access and the concrete driveway.

Retentionretentiondrivewayaccess

Generated from the description above by an AI model and may contain mistakes. The council’s description is the authoritative record.

Official record

Development description

Permission for retention is sought for removal of boundary wall, to widen vehicular access and widening of concrete driveway.

Built & sold

What happened next

Beyond the decision: whether this development was built, and what property here has sold for.

Recent sales nearby

within 500 m
Residential Property Price Register sales within 500 metres of this site
AddressDatePriceDistance
100 Deerpark, Friars Walk, CorkJan 2025€490,00030 m
39 Friars Walk, CorkDec 2025€412,00064 m
40 Friars Walk, Cork, CorkMay 2025€380,00070 m
125 Deerpark, Friars Walk, Corknot full market priceApr 2025€275,000141 m
47 Deerpark Rd, CorkOct 2025€400,000168 m
47 Deerpark Rd, CorkMay 2026€415,000168 m
128 Deerpark, Friars Walk, CorkNov 2025€375,000169 m
166 Deerpark, Friars Walk, CorkFeb 2026€380,000172 m

Nearby properties, not this site — a guide to local values.

Sources: Building Control Management System (commencement notices) and the Residential Property Price Register, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Records are matched to this application by location and may not be exhaustive; always confirm against the official source before relying on them.

Key dates

Timeline

  1. Application received9 September 2016
  2. Decision due3 November 2016
  3. Decision issued1 November 2016

Related developments

Similar applications

Ranked by what these developments actually propose, not by matching words — so you can see how comparable applications were decided.

Community

Discussion

What local people think about this application.

Nobody watching yet

Community sentiment

No votes yet

Nobody has voted on this application yet.

Community sentiment — a straw poll of people who visited this page, not a statutory submission. To make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.

Sign in to have your say on this application.

No comments yet. Be the first to say what you think about this application.

Sign in to join the discussion on this application.

Comments are moderated and are the opinions of the people who wrote them. They form no part of the statutory planning process — to make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.