74, Mount Albany, Blackrock, Co. Dublin
Single and two-storey extensions to the rear, side, and front of a house in Blackrock.
D08B/0011 · Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council · Lodged 11 January 2008
- Reference
- D08B/0011
- Authority
- Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council
- Register status
- Decided
- Type
- Permission
- Received
- 11 January 2008
Summary
AI-generatedThe development will consist of single and two-storey extensions to the rear, side, and front of the existing house at 74 Mount Albany. This will expand the living space of the property.
- Storeys
- 2
Generated from the description above by an AI model and may contain mistakes. The council’s description is the authoritative record.
Official record
Development description
The development will consist of a single and two storey extensions to the rear, side and front.
Built & sold
What happened next
Beyond the decision: whether this development was built, and what property here has sold for.
Recent sales nearby
within 500 m| Address | Date | Price | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70 Mount Albany, Blackrock, Dublin | Dec 2025 | €800,000 | 39 m |
| 61 Mount Albany, Blackrock, Dublin | Dec 2025 | €1,100,000 | 91 m |
| 59 Mount Albany, Blackrock, Dublin | Mar 2026 | €906,000 | 111 m |
| 19 Brookville Park, Blackrock, Co Dublin | Jul 2025 | €886,918 | 120 m |
| 89 Springhill Ave, Deans Grange, Blackrock | Dec 2025 | €721,000 | 146 m |
| 23 Rowanbyrn, Blackrock, Dublin | Mar 2026 | €772,000 | 191 m |
| 29a Brookville Park, Blackrock, Co Dublinnot full market price | Jan 2025 | €392,000 | 195 m |
| 18 Springhill Ave, Blackrock, Dublin | Sept 2025 | €770,000 | 205 m |
Nearby properties, not this site — a guide to local values.
Sources: Building Control Management System (commencement notices) and the Residential Property Price Register, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Records are matched to this application by location and may not be exhaustive; always confirm against the official source before relying on them.
Key dates
Timeline
- Application received11 January 2008
- Decision issued6 March 2008
- Appeal submitted2 April 2008
- Appeal decided10 October 2008
Related developments
Similar applications
Ranked by what these developments actually propose, not by matching words — so you can see how comparable applications were decided.
- GrantedExtension
The development will consist of a two storey extension to side and a single storey extension to rear
22, Old Rectory Park, Dundrum, Dublin 14
D04B/0736Dún Laoghaire–RathdownLodged 8 Oct 2004
- InvalidExtension
The development will consist of a two storey extension to the front and side of the dwelling and a single…
7, Dean Swift Green, Glasnevin, Dublin 11, D11 C993
WEB1223/19Dublin CityLodged 23 Apr 2019
- GrantedExtension
The development will consist of, a single storey extension to rear and a two storey extension to side over…
1 Hawthorn Lodge, Castleknock, Dublin 15
FW24A/0345FingalLodged 23 Aug 2024
- GrantedExtension
The development will consist of the construction of new single storey extension at rear and two storey…
10, Annaville Park, Dublin 14
D05B/0745Dún Laoghaire–RathdownLodged 17 Oct 2005
- GrantedExtension
The development will consist of a first floor side extension and a ground floor rear extension
58, Clancy Avenue, Finglas, Dublin 11
WEB1543/19Dublin CityLodged 17 Sept 2019
- GrantedExtension
The development will consist of a part single/two storey front extension, two storey side extension and part…
89 Clonmacnoise Road, Crumlin, Dublin 12
3466/23Dublin CityLodged 29 Mar 2023
Community
Discussion
What local people think about this application.
Community sentiment
No votes yetNobody has voted on this application yet.
Community sentiment — a straw poll of people who visited this page, not a statutory submission. To make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.
Sign in to have your say on this application.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you think about this application.
Sign in to join the discussion on this application.
Comments are moderated and are the opinions of the people who wrote them. They form no part of the statutory planning process — to make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.