Planning Permission Ireland
RefusedNew dwellingDecided 26 November 2008

4, Avondale Terrace, Perrystown, Dublin 12

A new dormer dwelling with a mansard roof in the side garden of a house in Perrystown.

SD08A/0675 · South Dublin County Council · Lodged 2 October 2008

Reference
SD08A/0675
Authority
South Dublin County Council
Register status
Decided
Type
Permission
Received
2 October 2008
Residential units
1
Floor area
80 m²

Summary

AI-generated

Permission is sought for the construction of a new dormer dwelling featuring a mansard roof and one dormer window, to be located in the side garden of an existing house.

New dwellinginfilldormergarden development

Generated from the description above by an AI model and may contain mistakes. The council’s description is the authoritative record.

Official record

Development description

New dormer dwelling with mansard roof and 1 no. Dormer window in the side garden of existing house.

Built & sold

What happened next

Beyond the decision: whether this development was built, and what property here has sold for.

Recent sales nearby

within 500 m
Residential Property Price Register sales within 500 metres of this site
AddressDatePriceDistance
45 Whitehall Sq, Whitehall Rd West, Perrystown Dublin 12Apr 2025€350,00086 m
14 Whitehall Sq, Quarry Dr, Perrystown Dublin 12Oct 2025€320,000106 m
84 Whitehall Rd West, Perrystown, Dublin 12Jan 2025€570,000127 m
24 Quarry Drive, Perrystown, Dublin 12Apr 2025€266,666140 m
12 Grove Field, Crumlinprice excludes VATFeb 2026€484,581197 m
10 Grove Field, Crumlinprice excludes VATFeb 2026€484,581197 m
1 Grove Field, Crumlinprice excludes VATFeb 2026€440,528197 m
11 Grove Field, Crumlinprice excludes VATFeb 2026€484,581197 m

Nearby properties, not this site — a guide to local values.

Sources: Building Control Management System (commencement notices) and the Residential Property Price Register, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Records are matched to this application by location and may not be exhaustive; always confirm against the official source before relying on them.

Key dates

Timeline

  1. Application received2 October 2008
  2. Decision due26 November 2008
  3. Decision issued26 November 2008

Related developments

Similar applications

Ranked by what these developments actually propose, not by matching words — so you can see how comparable applications were decided.

Community

Discussion

What local people think about this application.

Nobody watching yet

Community sentiment

No votes yet

Nobody has voted on this application yet.

Community sentiment — a straw poll of people who visited this page, not a statutory submission. To make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.

Sign in to have your say on this application.

No comments yet. Be the first to say what you think about this application.

Sign in to join the discussion on this application.

Comments are moderated and are the opinions of the people who wrote them. They form no part of the statutory planning process — to make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.