Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Longford: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Longford’s own decision notices: 268 of its 269 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (100%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
268
of 269 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
43
of 43 refused or part refused
Permissions read
223
of 226 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
9
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 43 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy81%
  2. Insufficient information42%
  3. Traffic safety, access and sightlines37%
  4. Undesirable precedent35%
  5. Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)28%
  6. Design, scale and visual impact26%
  7. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)26%
  8. On-site wastewater and public health26%
  9. Rural housing policy and local need26%
  10. Landscape, scenic views and routes12%
  11. Density, layout and residential standards9%
  12. Other7%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy3581%
Insufficient information1842%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines1637%
Undesirable precedent1535%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)1228%
Design, scale and visual impact1126%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)1126%
On-site wastewater and public health1126%
Rural housing policy and local need1126%
Landscape, scenic views and routes512%
Density, layout and residential standards49%
Other37%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 223 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking82%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes78%
  4. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)78%
  5. Construction hours and management76%
  6. Energy, EV charging and climate73%
  7. Restrictions on use or further development66%
  8. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)62%
  9. Waste management62%
  10. On-site wastewater treatment system54%
  11. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries39%
  12. Development contributions and security bonds38%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 19 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars223100%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking18382%
Materials, finishes and design changes17578%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)17478%
Construction hours and management17076%
Energy, EV charging and climate16273%
Restrictions on use or further development14866%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)13962%
Waste management13862%
On-site wastewater treatment system12054%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries8739%
Development contributions and security bonds8438%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)7333%
Other5525%
Occupancy and local-need conditions4018%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections3516%
Archaeology and built heritage2310%
Duration or temporary permission209%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge52%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Longford, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Extension5498% of decisions5 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes96%
  2. Energy, EV charging and climate92%
  3. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking92%
New dwelling59100% of decisions13 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes100%
  2. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking98%
  3. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries98%
Retention42100% of decisions8 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development71%
  2. Energy, EV charging and climate65%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)47%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Longford's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions