Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Offaly: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Offaly’s own decision notices: 445 of its 468 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (95%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
445
of 468 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
38
of 45 refused or part refused
Permissions read
399
of 423 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
9
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 38 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy97%
  2. Rural housing policy and local need61%
  3. Design, scale and visual impact26%
  4. Protected structures, ACAs and archaeology16%
  5. Traffic safety, access and sightlines16%
  6. Undesirable precedent16%
  7. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)11%
  8. Zoning and land use11%
  9. Density, layout and residential standards8%
  10. Insufficient information8%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy3797%
Rural housing policy and local need2361%
Design, scale and visual impact1026%
Protected structures, ACAs and archaeology616%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines616%
Undesirable precedent616%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)411%
Zoning and land use411%
Density, layout and residential standards38%
Insufficient information38%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 399 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)87%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)83%
  4. Construction hours and management80%
  5. Waste management79%
  6. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking75%
  7. Materials, finishes and design changes74%
  8. Restrictions on use or further development65%
  9. On-site wastewater treatment system56%
  10. Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections52%
  11. Development contributions and security bonds48%
  12. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries47%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars399100%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)34887%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)33083%
Construction hours and management32080%
Waste management31679%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking29975%
Materials, finishes and design changes29574%
Restrictions on use or further development25865%
On-site wastewater treatment system22556%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections20952%
Development contributions and security bonds19248%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries18947%
Occupancy and local-need conditions13634%
Other11228%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)3910%
Archaeology and built heritage267%
Duration or temporary permission185%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge164%
Energy, EV charging and climate123%
Part V social housing82%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Offaly, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural3397% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)100%
  2. Waste management94%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes88%
Extension7095% of decisions3 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)99%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
  3. Construction hours and management96%
New dwelling15894% of decisions25 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes100%
  2. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking98%
  3. Construction hours and management98%
Retention6398% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development79%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)77%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)57%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Offaly's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions