Eircom Exchange, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin
Retention of a 32.8-meter telecommunications monopole in Rush.
F12A/0263 · Fingal County Council · Lodged 22 August 2012
- Reference
- F12A/0263
- Authority
- Fingal County Council
- Register status
- Decided
- Type
- Retention
- Received
- 22 August 2012
Summary
AI-generatedThe application seeks permission for the continuation of use of an existing 32.8-meter telecommunications monopole. The structure is located at the Eircom Exchange in Rush.
Generated from the description above by an AI model and may contain mistakes. The council’s description is the authoritative record.
Official record
Development description
Permission for continuation of use of a 32.8m telecommunications monop
Land-use zoning
What this land is zoned for
“Protect and promote in a balanced way, the development of agriculture and rural related enterprise, biodiversity, the rural landscape, and the built and cultural heritage”
Objective set by the The Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029 (2023–2029). The planning authority decides each application on its own merits — this is the zoning context, not a compliance assessment.
Read the zoning objectives in the development planKey dates
Timeline
- Application received22 August 2012
- Decision due16 October 2012
- Decision issued12 October 2012
- Grant issued19 November 2012
In the area
Applications near this site
Other planning applications within about 500 m — what else is being proposed or built nearby.
- GrantedAt this site
The development of an existing telecommunications support structure (o
Eir Exchange, Whitestown Road, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin.
F21A/0640FingalLodged 11 Oct 2022Infrastructure
- GrantedAt this site
Retention of existing 32.8m telecommunications monopole with associate
Eir Exchange, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin.
F17A/0611FingalLodged 9 Oct 2017Retention
- Granted100 m away
Retain a single storey sunroom extension to the rear and to retain a d
Beauhill, Whitestown, Rush, Dublin
F22B/0010FingalLodged 2 Nov 2022Retention
- Granted450 m away
The retention of alterations to approved plans under F09A/0669, consis
Rogerstown, Rush, Co Dublin
F11A/0437FingalLodged 5 Dec 2011Retention
- Granted450 m away
The construction of rear extension to existing agricultural store and
Rogerstown, Rush, Co. Dublin.
F16A/0507FingalLodged 23 Mar 2017Retention
Related developments
Similar applications
Ranked by what these developments actually propose, not by matching words — so you can see how comparable applications were decided.
- GrantedRetention
PERMISSION FOR RETENTION OF AN EXISTING 26.5M HIGH TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE
RAHEENNAHOON, BALLYHOGE
20170143WexfordLodged 13 Feb 2017
- GrantedInfrastructure
Permission for continuance of use of the existing 30m high telecommuni
Keelings, Roslin, Kingstown, St Margarets, Co Dublin
F11A/0276FingalLodged 19 Jul 2011
- GrantedRetention
Permission retention of the existing 18m telecommunications monopole together
Inch, Castle Ellis
20211990WexfordLodged 17 Dec 2021
- Awaiting decisionInfrastructure
Permission to install a 30m multi-user telecommunications support structure
Ballask (E.D. Kilmore), Kilmore
20221210WexfordLodged 9 Sept 2022
- Awaiting decisionInfrastructure
Permission for the erection of an 18m high monopole telecommunications structure
Ramstown Lower, Gorey Rural
20230045WexfordLodged 20 Jan 2023
- Awaiting decisionInfrastructure
Permission to erect a 30m high telecommunications monopole structure together with antennas, dishes and…
Raheen , Elphin , Co. Roscommon
22158RoscommonLodged 24 Mar 2022
Community
Discussion
What local people think about this application.
Community sentiment
No votes yetNobody has voted on this application yet.
Community sentiment — a straw poll of people who visited this page, not a statutory submission. To make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.
Sign in to have your say on this application.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you think about this application.
Sign in to join the discussion on this application.
Comments are moderated and are the opinions of the people who wrote them. They form no part of the statutory planning process — to make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.