Eir Exchange, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin.
Retention of an existing 32.8-metre telecommunications monopole in Rush.
F17A/0611 · Fingal County Council · Lodged 9 October 2017
- Reference
- F17A/0611
- Authority
- Fingal County Council
- Register status
- Appealed
- Type
- Retention
- Received
- 9 October 2017
Summary
AI-generatedRetention permission is sought to keep an existing 32.8-metre tall telecommunications monopole and its associated equipment at the Eir Exchange in Rush.
Generated from the description above by an AI model and may contain mistakes. The council’s description is the authoritative record.
Official record
Development description
Retention of existing 32.8m telecommunications monopole with associate
Land-use zoning
What this land is zoned for
“Protect and promote in a balanced way, the development of agriculture and rural related enterprise, biodiversity, the rural landscape, and the built and cultural heritage”
Objective set by the The Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029 (2023–2029). The planning authority decides each application on its own merits — this is the zoning context, not a compliance assessment.
Read the zoning objectives in the development planKey dates
Timeline
- Application received9 October 2017
- Decision due3 December 2017
- Decision issued30 November 2017
- Grant issued1 August 2018
- Appeal submitted18 December 2017
- Appeal decided5 July 2018
In the area
Applications near this site
Other planning applications within about 500 m — what else is being proposed or built nearby.
- GrantedAt this site
The development of an existing telecommunications support structure (o
Eir Exchange, Whitestown Road, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin.
F21A/0640FingalLodged 11 Oct 2022Infrastructure
- GrantedAt this site
Permission for continuation of use of a 32.8m telecommunications monop
Eircom Exchange, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin
F12A/0263FingalLodged 22 Aug 2012Retention
- Granted100 m away
Retain a single storey sunroom extension to the rear and to retain a d
Beauhill, Whitestown, Rush, Dublin
F22B/0010FingalLodged 2 Nov 2022Retention
- Granted440 m away
The retention of alterations to approved plans under F09A/0669, consis
Rogerstown, Rush, Co Dublin
F11A/0437FingalLodged 5 Dec 2011Retention
- Granted450 m away
The construction of rear extension to existing agricultural store and
Rogerstown, Rush, Co. Dublin.
F16A/0507FingalLodged 23 Mar 2017Retention
Related developments
Similar applications
Ranked by what these developments actually propose, not by matching words — so you can see how comparable applications were decided.
- GrantedRetention
Permission retention of the existing 18m telecommunications monopole together
Inch, Castle Ellis
20211990WexfordLodged 17 Dec 2021
- Awaiting decisionRetention
RETENTION OF EXISTING 10.7M HIGH TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE (PREVIOUSLY GRANTED
BALLINDINAS, CARRICK
20170082WexfordLodged 1 Feb 2017
- GrantedRetention
RETENTION OF EXISTING 22M HIGH TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE (PREVIOUSLY GRANTED
KILCANNON, ENNISCORTHY RURAL
20170084WexfordLodged 1 Feb 2017
- Awaiting decisionRetention
RETENTION OF AN EXISTING 26.5M HIGH TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE (PREVIOUSLY
TOMFARNEY LOWER, BALLYHOGE
20170085WexfordLodged 1 Feb 2017
- GrantedRetention
Permission for continuation of use of a 32.8m telecommunications monop
Eircom Exchange, Beau, Rush, Co. Dublin
F12A/0263FingalLodged 22 Aug 2012
- GrantedRetention
Retention of the existing 15 metre high monopole telecommunications
Ardermere, Westmanstown Td, Lucan, Co. Dublin
FW18A/0053FingalLodged 17 Apr 2018
Community
Discussion
What local people think about this application.
Community sentiment
No votes yetNobody has voted on this application yet.
Community sentiment — a straw poll of people who visited this page, not a statutory submission. To make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.
Sign in to have your say on this application.
No comments yet. Be the first to say what you think about this application.
Sign in to join the discussion on this application.
Comments are moderated and are the opinions of the people who wrote them. They form no part of the statutory planning process — to make a valid observation you must submit it to the planning authority.