Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Clare: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Clare’s own decision notices: 962 of its 1,000 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (96%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
962
of 1,000 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
53
of 55 refused or part refused
Permissions read
894
of 945 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
5
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 53 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy79%
  2. Design, scale and visual impact53%
  3. Traffic safety, access and sightlines49%
  4. Landscape, scenic views and routes38%
  5. Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment28%
  6. Insufficient information28%
  7. Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)26%
  8. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)21%
  9. On-site wastewater and public health21%
  10. Zoning and land use19%
  11. Rural housing policy and local need17%
  12. Undesirable precedent17%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 16 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy4279%
Design, scale and visual impact2853%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines2649%
Landscape, scenic views and routes2038%
Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment1528%
Insufficient information1528%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)1426%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)1121%
On-site wastewater and public health1121%
Zoning and land use1019%
Rural housing policy and local need917%
Undesirable precedent917%
Other815%
Ribbon development611%
Protected structures, ACAs and archaeology59%
Density, layout and residential standards48%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 894 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)86%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes75%
  4. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)71%
  5. Development contributions and security bonds52%
  6. Restrictions on use or further development50%
  7. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking48%
  8. On-site wastewater treatment system47%
  9. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries33%
  10. Occupancy and local-need conditions27%
  11. Other17%
  12. Construction hours and management16%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars894100%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)76686%
Materials, finishes and design changes67275%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)63771%
Development contributions and security bonds46552%
Restrictions on use or further development44450%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking43248%
On-site wastewater treatment system42247%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries29433%
Occupancy and local-need conditions24427%
Other14817%
Construction hours and management14716%
Waste management11613%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections10512%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)9010%
Archaeology and built heritage738%
Duration or temporary permission657%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge283%
Part V social housing202%
Energy, EV charging and climate142%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Clare, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural67100% of decisions3 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)94%
  2. Waste management83%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)58%
Alterations7797% of decisions3 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes69%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)64%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)54%
Change of use5793% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes61%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)59%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)54%
Commercial43100% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes85%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)78%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)76%
Extension18497% of decisions5 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes98%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)81%
New dwelling25096% of decisions24 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes98%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)97%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds93%
Retention18695% of decisions7 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)78%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)55%
  3. Restrictions on use or further development54%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

By town

Towns with at least 30 refusals or permissions read, listed alphabetically.

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Clare's towns, listed alphabetically
TownNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Ennis7898% of decisions4 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)82%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes81%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)69%
Shannon3397% of decisions—
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes76%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)76%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)67%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Clare's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions