Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Meath: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Meath’s own decision notices: 1,271 of its 1,296 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (98%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
1,271
of 1,296 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
198
of 208 refused or part refused
Permissions read
1,039
of 1,088 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
7
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 198 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy86%
  2. Undesirable precedent56%
  3. Design, scale and visual impact49%
  4. Traffic safety, access and sightlines36%
  5. Insufficient information35%
  6. Rural housing policy and local need32%
  7. Landscape, scenic views and routes26%
  8. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)21%
  9. Zoning and land use16%
  10. On-site wastewater and public health14%
  11. Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)14%
  12. Density, layout and residential standards13%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 19 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy17086%
Undesirable precedent11156%
Design, scale and visual impact9749%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines7236%
Insufficient information6935%
Rural housing policy and local need6332%
Landscape, scenic views and routes5126%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)4221%
Zoning and land use3116%
On-site wastewater and public health2814%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)2714%
Density, layout and residential standards2513%
Other2513%
Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment2412%
Protected structures, ACAs and archaeology2111%
Flood risk2010%
Ribbon development116%
Premature pending infrastructure or a plan63%
Water supply and public sewer capacity63%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 1,039 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars99%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes73%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)72%
  4. Restrictions on use or further development71%
  5. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)70%
  6. Construction hours and management63%
  7. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking50%
  8. On-site wastewater treatment system42%
  9. Development contributions and security bonds40%
  10. Occupancy and local-need conditions34%
  11. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries34%
  12. Waste management28%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars1,03099%
Materials, finishes and design changes75973%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)75072%
Restrictions on use or further development73571%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)72670%
Construction hours and management65563%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking52050%
On-site wastewater treatment system43942%
Development contributions and security bonds41340%
Occupancy and local-need conditions35234%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries35134%
Waste management29328%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)18918%
Other17116%
Duration or temporary permission10410%
Archaeology and built heritage757%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections565%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge555%
Energy, EV charging and climate333%
Part V social housing333%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Meath, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural4794% of decisions12 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development89%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)86%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes83%
Alterations94100% of decisions11 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes76%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)67%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)57%
Change of use5698% of decisions9 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development79%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)74%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes72%
Commercial55100% of decisions9 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)89%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes87%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)87%
Extension27399% of decisions23 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development90%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)89%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes86%
Infrastructure41100% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)78%
  2. Construction hours and management68%
  3. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking68%
New dwelling38497% of decisions
  1. Contrary to development plan policy88%
  2. Rural housing policy and local need59%
  3. Undesirable precedent58%
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)75%
  2. Development contributions and security bonds73%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes71%
Retention20698% of decisions24 read — too few
  1. Restrictions on use or further development81%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes57%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)49%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

By town

Towns with at least 30 refusals or permissions read, listed alphabetically.

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Meath's towns, listed alphabetically
TownNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Ashbourne34100% of decisions4 read — too few
  1. Construction hours and management90%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)90%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)83%
Navan7097% of decisions7 read — too few
  1. Materials, finishes and design changes87%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)80%
  3. Construction hours and management75%
Trim3294% of decisions—
  1. Restrictions on use or further development84%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes75%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)72%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Meath's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions