Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Monaghan: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Monaghan’s own decision notices: 477 of its 490 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (97%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
477
of 490 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
32
of 33 refused or part refused
Permissions read
435
of 457 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
7
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 32 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy100%
  2. Traffic safety, access and sightlines44%
  3. Insufficient information41%
  4. Design, scale and visual impact34%
  5. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)28%
  6. Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)25%
  7. Density, layout and residential standards22%
  8. Landscape, scenic views and routes22%
  9. Undesirable precedent19%
  10. Zoning and land use16%
  11. Other13%
  12. Rural housing policy and local need13%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 15 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy32100%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines1444%
Insufficient information1341%
Design, scale and visual impact1134%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)928%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)825%
Density, layout and residential standards722%
Landscape, scenic views and routes722%
Undesirable precedent619%
Zoning and land use516%
Other413%
Rural housing policy and local need413%
Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment39%
Flood risk39%
On-site wastewater and public health39%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 435 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Development contributions and security bonds82%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)76%
  4. Materials, finishes and design changes74%
  5. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries65%
  6. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking57%
  7. On-site wastewater treatment system50%
  8. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)49%
  9. Restrictions on use or further development49%
  10. Waste management40%
  11. Construction hours and management34%
  12. Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections28%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars435100%
Development contributions and security bonds35682%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)33276%
Materials, finishes and design changes32374%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries28465%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking24857%
On-site wastewater treatment system21950%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)21249%
Restrictions on use or further development21249%
Waste management17340%
Construction hours and management15034%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections12128%
Occupancy and local-need conditions5813%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)4510%
Other379%
Duration or temporary permission358%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge164%
Part V social housing143%
Archaeology and built heritage133%
Energy, EV charging and climate72%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Monaghan, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural4796% of decisions4 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)98%
  2. Waste management95%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds90%
Alterations41100% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds64%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes54%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)49%
Extension7596% of decisions—
  1. Development contributions and security bonds78%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes78%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)61%
New dwelling13496% of decisions9 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds100%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes98%
Retention7996% of decisions10 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds87%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)57%
  3. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries52%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

By town

Towns with at least 30 refusals or permissions read, listed alphabetically.

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Monaghan's towns, listed alphabetically
TownNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Monaghan3397% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)71%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)65%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds61%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Monaghan's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions