Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Tipperary: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Tipperary’s own decision notices: 1,027 of its 1,030 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (100%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
1,027
of 1,030 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
47
of 47 refused or part refused
Permissions read
960
of 983 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
6
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 47 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy79%
  2. Undesirable precedent43%
  3. Zoning and land use30%
  4. Other26%
  5. Insufficient information21%
  6. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)21%
  7. Traffic safety, access and sightlines21%
  8. Design, scale and visual impact13%
  9. Density, layout and residential standards11%
  10. Flood risk11%
  11. Rural housing policy and local need11%
  12. On-site wastewater and public health9%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 16 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy3779%
Undesirable precedent2043%
Zoning and land use1430%
Other1226%
Insufficient information1021%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)1021%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines1021%
Design, scale and visual impact613%
Density, layout and residential standards511%
Flood risk511%
Rural housing policy and local need511%
On-site wastewater and public health49%
Protected structures, ACAs and archaeology49%
Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment36%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)36%
Ribbon development36%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 960 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)91%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)76%
  4. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking72%
  5. Materials, finishes and design changes67%
  6. Construction hours and management66%
  7. Development contributions and security bonds57%
  8. Restrictions on use or further development52%
  9. On-site wastewater treatment system34%
  10. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries31%
  11. Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections26%
  12. Occupancy and local-need conditions20%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars959100%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)87591%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)73276%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking69272%
Materials, finishes and design changes64567%
Construction hours and management63866%
Development contributions and security bonds55057%
Restrictions on use or further development49652%
On-site wastewater treatment system32434%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries30031%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections25326%
Occupancy and local-need conditions19420%
Waste management19220%
Other17618%
Duration or temporary permission687%
Archaeology and built heritage596%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)556%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge273%
Energy, EV charging and climate202%
Part V social housing162%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Tipperary, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural122100% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
  2. Waste management94%
  3. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)92%
Alterations66100% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)48%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)47%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes45%
Change of use65100% of decisions10 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)78%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes73%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)73%
Commercial3797% of decisions5 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)94%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes90%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)87%
Extension210100% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)93%
  3. Construction hours and management86%
Infrastructure54100% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking81%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)81%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)81%
New dwelling18399% of decisions10 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds99%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes99%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)99%
Retention221100% of decisions8 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)94%
  2. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking72%
  3. Restrictions on use or further development60%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

By town

Towns with at least 30 refusals or permissions read, listed alphabetically.

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Tipperary's towns, listed alphabetically
TownNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Clonmel54100% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)77%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)71%
  3. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking67%
Nenagh4598% of decisions5 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)79%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)79%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes72%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Tipperary's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions