Skip to content

Refusals and conditions

From the council's decision notices

Mayo: why applications are refused, and the conditions permissions carry

Counted from Mayo’s own decision notices: 1,090 of its 1,118 decisions made from 25 October 2025 to 25 October 2026 (97%). Findings, not verdicts — each figure is a share of the notices read.

Decision notices read
1,090
of 1,118 decisions, last 12 months
Refusals read
68
of 70 refused or part refused
Permissions read
1,019
of 1,048 granted or part granted
Conditions on a permission
7
the median permission read

Why applications are refused

Grounds cited in refusals

Share of 68 refusals whose decision notice we read

  1. Contrary to development plan policy75%
  2. Landscape, scenic views and routes43%
  3. Undesirable precedent35%
  4. Design, scale and visual impact32%
  5. Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)28%
  6. Rural housing policy and local need28%
  7. Traffic safety, access and sightlines26%
  8. On-site wastewater and public health21%
  9. Density, layout and residential standards19%
  10. Insufficient information16%
  11. Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)13%
  12. Zoning and land use9%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of refusals refused at least partly on that ground. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 15 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Contrary to development plan policy5175%
Landscape, scenic views and routes2943%
Undesirable precedent2435%
Design, scale and visual impact2232%
Neighbours' amenity (overlooking, overshadowing, overbearing)1928%
Rural housing policy and local need1928%
Traffic safety, access and sightlines1826%
On-site wastewater and public health1421%
Density, layout and residential standards1319%
Insufficient information1116%
Environmental effects (noise, emissions, EIA)913%
Zoning and land use69%
Ecology, Natura 2000 and appropriate assessment57%
Flood risk34%
Water supply and public sewer capacity34%

The conditions permissions carry

Kinds of condition attached

Share of 1,019 permissions whose decision notice we read

  1. Built as per the plans and particulars100%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)84%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds72%
  4. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)63%
  5. Materials, finishes and design changes60%
  6. Restrictions on use or further development59%
  7. Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking56%
  8. On-site wastewater treatment system48%
  9. Construction hours and management38%
  10. Other32%
  11. Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries32%
  12. Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections22%

A notice counts once for each theme it cites, however often it cites it — the share of permissions given at least one condition of that kind. A notice can cite several, so the shares do not add up to 100%. The 12 most common of 20 are drawn; the table has them all.

Show the numbers
ThemeNoticesShare
Built as per the plans and particulars1,019100%
Surface water and drainage (SuDS)85484%
Development contributions and security bonds73472%
Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)64563%
Materials, finishes and design changes61560%
Restrictions on use or further development60159%
Entrance, sightlines, roads and parking56656%
On-site wastewater treatment system49048%
Construction hours and management38938%
Other32932%
Landscaping, hedgerows, trees and boundaries32132%
Uisce Éireann water and sewer connections22622%
Waste management19519%
Occupancy and local-need conditions17817%
Duration or temporary permission646%
Ecology (bats, nesting birds, AA mitigation)646%
Estate completion, lighting, naming and taking in charge394%
Energy, EV charging and climate323%
Archaeology and built heritage313%
Part V social housing222%

By type of development

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Mayo, by type of development
TypeNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Agricultural7899% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)96%
  2. Waste management84%
  3. Construction hours and management82%
Alterations6398% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds48%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)41%
  3. Duration or temporary permission39%
Change of use5196% of decisions8 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)74%
  2. Materials, finishes and design changes65%
  3. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)65%
Commercial3897% of decisions2 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)86%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)81%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds69%
Extension22597% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)87%
  2. Development contributions and security bonds76%
  3. Restrictions on use or further development73%
New dwelling33598% of decisions
  1. Contrary to development plan policy83%
  2. Landscape, scenic views and routes67%
  3. Rural housing policy and local need50%
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)97%
  2. Development contributions and security bonds93%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes92%
Retention17896% of decisions10 read — too few
  1. Development contributions and security bonds77%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)73%
  3. Restrictions on use or further development68%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

By town

Towns with at least 30 refusals or permissions read, listed alphabetically.

The grounds cited in refusals and the conditions attached in Mayo's towns, listed alphabetically
TownNotices readRefusals: most citedPermissions: most common conditions
Ballina5198% of decisions1 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)74%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)64%
  3. Restrictions on use or further development62%
Castlebar4896% of decisions4 read — too few
  1. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)75%
  2. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)68%
  3. Materials, finishes and design changes61%
Westport5298% of decisions5 read — too few
  1. Surface water and drainage (SuDS)80%
  2. Protecting neighbours (screening, glazing, noise, light)67%
  3. Development contributions and security bonds65%

Shares are of the refusals or permissions whose notice was read. The conditions column leaves out “built as per the plans and particulars”, which nearly every permission carries. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown.

About the figures

PPI’s reader reads each decision notice, finds every refusal reason and condition in it word for word, and tags each with what it is about from a fixed list. A figure counts notices: a refusal citing flood risk in two of its reasons counts once for flood risk. Reasons and conditions the reader could not find word for word are not counted.

What a council refuses for, and the conditions it attaches, depend on what it was asked to decide as much as on the council. A group with fewer than 30 notices read shows its count and no breakdown. Every council read →

Source Mayo's decision notices, read and counted by PPI; no notice text is reproduced hereAlways confirm a decision against the council’s own register.

Independent planning information for Ireland — not a government website or an official planning service, and not legal advice. Contains Irish Public Sector Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Always confirm details with the relevant local authority before relying on them.

Planning portal

Free pre-planning reportCheck a site before you apply
Map of applicationsEvery application on one map, with zoning and heritage layers
AreasCounties and towns
Planning statisticsThe national picture, and every council side by side
CommencementsWhat actually got built
Property salesWhat it sold for
Ask the planning assistantPlain-English questions